Venezuelan opposition leader and 2025 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado arrives in Washington amid tense negotiations over her country’s future. Her visit coincides with U.S. debates over Venezuela’s leadership following Nicolás Maduro’s removal from power.
Machado’s arrival in the U.S. capital follows a volatile year in Venezuelan politics, marked by shifting power and uncertainty. Only a year earlier, she had been on the campaign trail in Caracas, working to rally citizens against Maduro as he entered a third term despite disputed election outcomes. Although her candidate, Edmundo González, was widely reported to have secured a clear victory, Maduro’s administration held on to power, pushing Machado to the margins and keeping her mostly out of public view until she reappeared in Norway last month to receive her Nobel Prize. Her bold journey out of Venezuela to accept the honor underscored both her determination and the fragile nature of her circumstances.
Despite her global acclaim, Machado remained on the sidelines while the U.S. carried out an extraordinary mission that led to the capture of Maduro and his wife, relocating them to New York to stand trial on narcoterrorism and drug trafficking accusations. Although Maduro is now in custody, his loyalists still wield power in Caracas, creating obstacles for Machado’s political aspirations.
The intricate equation behind U.S. support
Throughout this period, Maria Corina Machado has sought to maintain favor with the Trump administration. She publicly endorsed certain White House actions against alleged narcotraffickers in the Caribbean and controversially dedicated her Nobel Prize to President Trump, a move reflecting both strategy and admiration. Yet when Maduro was removed from office, it was not Machado who received the administration’s backing but rather Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro’s longtime deputy.
Rodríguez’s rise highlights how political pragmatism intersects with U.S. strategic priorities. Although Machado is widely praised for her moral standing and global recognition, she does not possess the ties to Venezuela’s military and security institutions that Trump is said to value. Rodríguez, on the other hand, has built connections and shown consistent alignment with U.S. goals, from enabling oil exports to keeping communication channels open with American officials. Her advancement reflects an administration intent on favoring stability and economic prospects rather than strict ideological alignment with democratic reform advocates.
Machado’s Nobel Prize, while celebrated worldwide, becomes complex within Washington’s political landscape. Trump has voiced his own frustration over not receiving the distinction, introducing an unpredictable twist to Machado’s attempt to use her accolade for political leverage. According to sources, in recent weeks she has had no direct contact with the president since dedicating the award to him, placing her in a sensitive situation as she works to rebuild momentum within U.S. policy circles.
Obstacles to restoring influence
Machado’s path to securing Trump’s support faces significant obstacles. In public statements, she has criticized Rodríguez’s ascent, highlighting her involvement with El Helicoide prison and the imposition of U.S. sanctions since 2017 for human rights violations. Nevertheless, these criticisms may hold limited weight with a U.S. administration prioritizing access to Venezuela’s oil and the continuity of governmental cooperation over democratic principles.
The White House appears convinced that Machado cannot command sufficient loyalty from Venezuela’s military and security apparatus to govern effectively if Maduro were removed. Rodríguez, by contrast, has spent years demonstrating her reliability and strategic alignment with U.S. objectives, including facilitating oil shipments and coordinating economic appointments favorable to American companies. A recent visit by U.S. chargé d’affaires Joe McNamara to Caracas signaled a willingness to reopen diplomatic channels under Rodríguez’s oversight, further reinforcing her advantage.
Although these obstacles remain, Machado still holds several advantages. Her long-standing ties to influential figures like Senator Marco Rubio give her a circle of political allies in Washington. She also benefits from in-person access to the president, a rare chance to shape perceptions and directly steer decisions, whereas Rodríguez has had fewer opportunities to do so, as her interactions with Trump have largely taken place over the phone.
Deliberate strategy and nuanced political judgment
Machado’s approach in Washington requires careful timing and strategic messaging. With Trump known for making decisions based on personal assessments of character, her public credibility, combined with her Nobel recognition, positions her to make a compelling case. The fluid nature of Trump’s foreign policy, as seen in his handling of prior crises and ongoing conflicts, means that alliances and preferences can shift rapidly, offering Machado potential openings to assert influence.
Although she does not yet command Venezuela’s power structures or its profitable oil sector, Machado’s focus on moral legitimacy, global visibility, and targeted advocacy could help her gain traction. Her ability to exploit Rodriguez’s weaknesses while presenting herself as a credible blend of principle and pragmatism may appeal to influential actors looking for stability without distancing democratic audiences.
In the volatile landscape of U.S.-Venezuelan relations, Machado’s challenge is to translate symbolic power into practical leverage. She must navigate a complex political environment, balancing criticism of Maduro’s regime with overtures to a U.S. administration that values operational reliability and economic returns. Her visit to Washington represents both a testing ground and a strategic opportunity to reposition herself in the eyes of the administration and broader international community.
Maria Corina Machado’s journey over the past year has been marked by personal risk, international recognition, and political uncertainty. As she engages in high-stakes discussions in Washington, she must reconcile her status as a Nobel laureate with the practical realities of U.S. foreign policy priorities. Rodríguez’s current advantage underscores the administration’s preference for operational stability and economic cooperation over democratic credentials alone.
Nevertheless, Machado’s access to influential policymakers, her public visibility, and her strategic acumen provide her with tools to advocate for her vision for Venezuela’s future. Her ability to convert international prestige into tangible political influence will determine whether she can regain a central role in shaping the country’s trajectory. In a political landscape defined by rapid shifts and competing interests, Machado’s resilience and strategic calculation may yet position her as a key figure in U.S.-Venezuelan relations.
The last leader to underestimate her determination now faces the consequences of misjudging her influence—a cautionary reminder of the enduring power of resolve, reputation, and political savvy in international affairs.